|
| NEXT ISSUE | BACK ISSUES | CONTENTS | |
| FOCUS: FASHION STRIKE |
|
Emily Bick on the new counter revolutionaries
So, how’s the strike going? Are you wearing your unadorned grey sweatsuit at every gallery opening and launch party? Or maybe you’ve opted for nothing but a sheet outside, and nakedness at home to protest against the insane hamster wheel of signifiers that is fashion. Dropping out. Doing other, worthier things with your time than prowling eBay for cheap ’80s Comme and ’30s chiffon dresses, or those rare one-off accessories that capture every subtle nuance of your being, for the moment anyway. Got your uniform, comrade? No, me neither. There are two rival fashion strikes afoot.
The first, sponsored by ‘Cheap Date’ magazine, is a fashion strike in
support of TRAID (Textile Recycling for Aid and International Development, a
charity that resells cast-off clothes or donates them to developing
countries). To participate, you need to pledge to wear a sheet over your
clothes or nothing at all from the 14th to the 28th of May, and then collect
pledges from sponsors. All this would be easier to swallow if it wasn’t
published in a magazine where half the staff are supermodels or contributing
editors to Vogue. Accompanying the pledge sheet are pen-and-ink
illustrations of a naked woman on a bed and a naked woman dressed in a
sheet, ‘as designed by Bella Freud’. The strapline? ‘Stop Fashion Hypocrisy
Now’. I’m not even going to start on the photos of Sadie Frost ‘wearing a
sheet and filled with inner peace and happiness’. ‘I, the undersigned, consider contemporary fashion to be life-diminishing. In the interests of humanity I ask that you observe the Fashion Strike and cease trading from 14th May 2004.’ But even TRAID depends on the relentless fashion cycle to provide the underused discards it resells or ships off to Africa, and Cheap Date’s editors need people like Wintour to give them jobs. The ‘Grey Sweatsuit Revolution’ is a more
low-key affair. It hails from Canada, the land that gave us Adbusters and
Naomi Klein. The website is no-nonsense – a manifesto written in the
simplest sans-serif type in grey on a white background, with no flash
animations or design pyrotechnics. Celebrity names? Forget it, even the
founders don’t list themselves or try to take credit. But the sentiment is
much the same: There’s a lot to be said for uniforms. Andy
Warhol once said that the best look after a ‘bad’ look was ‘a good, plain
look’ – something that was either so boring and classic as to be beyond
fashion, or something so unique and well-suited to a particular person that
they could get away with it for years. Looking at pictures of Warhol
throughout his career, it’s easy to see he took his own advice. Despite a
few changes here and there – in the 1970s he swapped his Velvets-style
leather jacket for Brooks Brothers corduroy blazers; in the ’80s, his wigs
got spikier, influenced by Stephen Sprouse and the crowd at Xenon – a
definitive Andy look remains. The wigs, the skinny jeans or chinos, the
sunglasses – they’re icons. Likewise, think of Stevie Nicks – her
California, sun-drenched, Quaalude ‘n’ coke, gypsy witchery is still going
strong to this day, to the extent that in New York drag queens celebrate the
‘night of 1000 Stevies’ every year. In fact, almost anyone who is promoted
to the status of ‘fashion icon’ or ‘gay icon’ (and if you drew a Venn
diagram, the overlap would be huge) has their own, consistent uniform that
they keep, regardless of the moment’s stylistic dictates. If that’s the case, the most rebellious
protest against the fashion system may just be to wear the same old stuff
that’s kicking around in your closet. Find what you absolutely adore and
replace it when it falls apart. You want new meanings? You want your clothes
to tell the world how plugged in and original you really are? Go out and
live. Supply new contexts. Or just wait for time to pass, and history will
do it for you. |
|
| NEXT ISSUE | BACK ISSUES | CONTENTS | |