| NEXT ISSUE  |  BACK ISSUES  |  CONTENTS |

PROFILE: The Frantic Speed of Stillness
Nataline Colonnello profiles the work of Xie Nanxing

Xie Nanxing self-inflicts deliberate and systematic crises. Through unceasing questioning Xie has been able to develop a solid and very personal kind of painting. His oil paintings, limited in number and often grouped as a series, are characterised by large-scale canvases (220 x 380 cm, in the case of a series from 2001–2), to which he painstakingly devotes himself for long periods. As the final stage of a complex and multi-layered preparatory process, which includes video recording and photography, Xie’s works are generated from painted light, as if they were subjected to a photographic developing bath. By means of a mastered technique, alien to any projection of images onto the canvas, the subjects are slowly brought into being by four thin coats of paint.

The source photographs are usually taken with a Polaroid or ordinary automatic camera, and consist of distorted, unfocused, decentred, over- or under-exposed images of everyday subjects: the flames of a gas range, a corridor, a girl. It is precisely when these low quality pictures and apparently banal images are transposed and enlarged on the pictorial surface that the depicted reality shows itself in a new and bewildering light. For the most part, the portrayed scenes are planned with manic fetishism, to the minutest detail, and imbued with cryptic symbolism. With regard to his 2004 series of images of roosters, Xie explains: ‘Roosters are a very strange creation of nature, but at the same time they are brimful of passion, sensuality … their plumage … of course in my paintings this is even more obvious because I displayed the dynamic state of my subjects, the direction of their feathers. This is tantamount to making a first artwork on the roosters’ body, but the eventual painting is to be considered as the ultimate work of art.’





Through universally recognisable pictures and cinematographic rendering, Xie’s ‘psychological painting’ lures the viewer, with its ostensible familiarity and its sense of déja-vu, into the snare of his dreamlike visions, triggering the viewer’s dim and confused recollections. Through a strict control of the surface and a chilly realism that has recently been merging into a certain degree of abstraction, Xie creates an inexplicable, restless and dramatic visual language, while interpretation is left to the subconscious activity of the observer (which is also why the major part of the artist’s works remain untitled). When talking of work made in 2004, Xie says: ‘To tell the truth [it] is like a stage; moreover, this time I did nothing to conceal this dramatic character because I wanted to try and find, both in realism and in abstraction, a way that would make people feel confused and dizzy. I wanted to see how this combination would work…’

Since 2000–1, Xie has further piqued the viewer’s curiosity by including sequences shot with a camcorder directly from the TV screen among his preliminary materials. With the earlier paintings the viewer has the impression of witnessing a single instant of an ongoing story, of which the past and future developments remain wrapped in mystery. Now the artist seems to supply a plot, but this is simply pretence. Although time expands, as well as the dimensions of the paintings, and although more elements of the same event – if there is one – are implied by the multiplication of the canvases (see the huge blue triptychs), the nature of these works is still unfathomable.

In the 2000–1 series the surface of the paintings imitates a screen with stills from second-rate videotapes. Horizontal interference strips spread across the width of the canvas and the light seems pixellated. Although the image seems to refer to an objective view through a mechanical lens, it nevertheless has a stifling atmosphere. A sense of pervading spiritual spleen is conveyed by the use of blue, inspired by Yves Klein, which becomes a dingy patina mantling all the works.
The 2002–3 series, comprising six paintings, also alludes to the cinematographic sequence, cut and reassembled without narrative continuity. In these works, Xie reproduces the same bare room – the artist’s studio – from different viewpoints at different times. While the third, fifth and sixth painting depict only the empty indoor space, the first, second and fourth each portray a different naked person lying rigidly on the floor. The paintings have become increasingly abstract, meditative and enigmatic. Whereas in a series from 1998–9, which caused a stir at the 48th Venice Biennale, the life force is still apparent in the bleeding men (all transfigured self-portraits), in the more recent work the human subjects (Xie and his parents) become blurred still lifes, remote volumetric masses, human landscapes. Real or presumed death has a fascinating coldness; eternity is plumbed and obsessively replicated in a claustrophobic mental space with no way out, for Xie or us.





In contrast to the work of 2000–1, which has an emotional membrane that throbs at a regular rate, the paintings in the 2002–3 series vibrate with individual intensities. From a technical point of view, the visual obstacle characterised by horizontal video lines disappears. Through a reduced Cézanne-like palette the surface looks livid, speckled and grainy, like a remote echo of Monet. If in this series Xie combines photorealism and a purely pictorial gesture, it is in order to ‘see whether contemporary viewers, in this epoch dominated by photography, are still able to deal with a pictorial surface, even if it recalls a photographic process’.
Xie’s latest series of 2004 is composed of three paintings which foreground an unfocused close-up image of a human-like figure. The hardly recognisable subjects are portrayed in three different positions, from three different angles: behind, above and beneath. Once more balancing realism and abstraction, Xie further delves into the topic of death. The subjects – roosters’ corpses of enormous dimensions – loom over the spectator and force him to cope with death in its entirety and inevitability.

It is interesting to notice how the triptych recurs in recent works. In the roosters series, for instance, there are three paintings, three roosters, three camera angles, three main colours and three conflicting forces intrinsic to the composition: implosion, explosion and stillness. For Xie the number three is highly symbolic, with philosophical and psychological connotations. Besides, it is through the clash, the exchange and the rhythm of contrasting thrusts that Xie achieves a new level of understanding. Asked about his forthcoming paintings, the artist comments: ‘Isn’t it a game full of possibilities, an exciting game? In my works there are always many conflicts that I can master, but also uncontrollable ones.’

Nataline Colonnello is an Italian Beijing-based art critic and curator

 | NEXT ISSUE  |  BACK ISSUES  |  CONTENTS |