| NEXT ISSUE  |  BACK ISSUES  |  CONTENTS |

REVIEWS
NEW YORK: TANYA BONAKDAR GALLERY

OLAFUR ELIASSON
26 April – 14 June
www.tanyabonakdargallery.com

Olafur Eliasson has two aims: focusing viewers’ attention on natural phenomena – such as fog, rainbows, waterfalls, and reflections – and on how we perceive them. In a project a few years ago at MoMA in New York, this concern was quite literal. He coated the wall separating the museum’s interior from its garden with reflective glass so that the viewers, peering out, viewed their own act of looking. In his most recent installation, Eliasson made tangible the Euclidean rules of the game – the mathematical formulas to which, in Western thought, the natural forms around us can be reduced. He constructed a model room out of plywood shelving within the gallery. Cabinets overflowed with mirrored geodesic domes, steel spirals, wooden spheres, aluminium foil kaleidoscopes, and cardboard helixes. Made in expendable, studio-quality materials, the maquettes appeared less like scientific truths arranged in a neat geometric order than fantastically shaped figures from an obsessed, and somewhat dated, imagination. The room suggested a cluttered warehouse full of discarded, antiquated ways of understanding space.





Like a courageous husband, Eliasson takes on his subjects’ art-historical and theoretical baggage – here, Euclidean geometry, Cartesian philosophy and Buckminster Fuller’s utopian theories. In earlier projects it was sunsets, waterfalls and romantic depictions of the sublime; light, mediation and James Turrell’s experiments; illusion, camera obscura and perspective in Renaissance painting. This consideration of earlier approaches to nature is not a postmodern nod to precedent, it is the very point of the works. Above all, Eliasson is interested in the perception and representation of our surroundings, highlighting how our understanding of so-called pure, natural phenomena is culturally specific. The twisting helixes in his storeroom are not simply beautiful shapes, but products of Western scientific rationalism. Balancing this investigative, theoretical slant is Eliasson’s reverential, awe-inspired wonder about nature, which inevitably leads viewers to note that he spent a portion of his childhood in Iceland – a land of steam springs, moss-covered rocks and barren, craggy landscapes. It is now a hackneyed point to make but one that seems, in the end, not at all incidental to the strange, beautiful and superb expressions he creates.

Melissa Gronlund

 | NEXT ISSUE  |  BACK ISSUES  |  CONTENTS |