|
| NEXT ISSUE | BACK ISSUES | CONTENTS | |
| REVIEWS |
|
London: Hauser &
Wirth Anri Sala 3 June – 17 July www.hauserwirth.com
The club is on the ground floor, where Balearic beats pump out of oversized
speakers, bruising the air. The chill-out room’s downstairs, through the
inches-thick metal door of the vault in this former Midland bank. Let’s take
the club first. Anri Sala’s video Mixed Behaviour (2003) opens up
with an ambiguous-looking shot that resolves itself into an image of a DJ
cueing up some turntables under a rain cover. The music starts amid a sonic
scuffle of raindrops detonating on the tarp, and an establishing shot
reveals that the DJ is on a roof, playing for a nocturnal city whose
residents can’t be seen. (Additional information: this is Tirana, Albania,
on a wet New Year’s Eve in 2003.) Explosions rip through the sky –
fireworks, adding further dramatic crackle to some conservative tribal-house
tunes. Screamers arc dramatically over the DJ’s head. As the music blasts
around the gallery, changing a couple of times over the course of the film’s
eight-minute duration, and the image (replayed on a small monitor and thus
resolutely anti-spectacular) plays on without much variation, one realises
that the bulk of one’s experience is auditory. In the mix, equal space is
given to the music and the event’s texture – the whizzes and bangs of
fireworks, which can’t help but sound like more warlike detonations –
particularly in the context of Sala’s work, which on more than one occasion
has probed the dislocations of contemporary Eastern Europe, the legacies of
totalitarianism and the travails of present-day militarisation. Downstairs, in the darkened vault (where, ratcheting up the tension a notch, a guard stands outside to let one out should that heavy door swing shut), a language is again in the process of becoming, and again becomes loosely tied to a socio-political trajectory. Làkkat (2004) was shot in Senegal, and initially is all black screen, sound and subtitle. It’s a dialogue, we can tell, even though the language is Wolof. Two children are being taught a new tongue, and the words they are being taught are significant. The boy is struggling with ‘shining’ – apparently, he keeps saying ‘dining’ (although the second word probably isn’t ‘dining’; the rhyme is a symptom of subtitling, and the first sign that we are linguistically adrift). Now he’s being taught more words: ‘light-skinned’, ‘lighter’, ‘whitey’, ‘pale-skinned’, ‘alien’, ‘dark’, ‘very dark thing’, ‘outlandish’. We see the boys’ faces. The language is loaded, and again it is not the only sonic element. That faint chinking sound is butterflies hitting a strip-light which, seen in recessive perspective, burns through the darkness and punctuates the footage of the boys. Towards the end, we see that a man is controlling the boys’ intonation with hand movements, like a conductor. The boys have become very skilled at responding, but they have a scared look in their eyes. Sala has a phobia of spelling things out, preferring to keep one foot in the documentary camp, even as he tweaks his material to make it appear to be running an oblique internal commentary on itself. The word làkkat means ‘one whose native tongue is different from the language of the place where he is’, which also suggests linguistic imperfection. Clearly some of the subtitles are wrong. The children are expertly absorbing a partial view of language. The blind movement of the butterflies towards the light is an obvious metaphor but, in context, its meaning isn’t clear at all. And in the meantime, something is being communicated to the viewer – an idea of geographical instability that has resulted in hybrids, yet an idea which is overtaken by a sense of complete uncertainty generated by the structure of the artwork itself and even by its site-specificity. As ever with language and communication, it’s about what you don’t say, as much as what you do. If by that notion Sala wants not only to suggest worldly flux but also to focus attention back on the person behind the camera – who selects, frames, cuts, and isn’t necessarily to be trusted – he succeeds admirably. Rosalind Furness |
|
| NEXT ISSUE | BACK ISSUES | CONTENTS | |